The absence of the tree of life (a biblical term) that should be replaced by a rhizome of life, which alone allows us to understand that all beings are mosaics of genes and are not at the end of an unique branch with a common ancestor. I think that none of the initial definitions of Darwin is correct and of course I do not believe that the Bible has predicted evolution any better. On the contrary, my hypothesis is that Darwin is the father of intelligent design because the Darwinian theory is perfectly in line with the terms and that of the biblical vision. The induction of change only by chance, the principle of natural selection, and negation of adaptation, are untrue. Moreover I believe that most changes are rising from stochastic, catastrophic events that eliminate species mostly randomly. The idea of gradualism is also mostly untrue. The origin of humans brought also extreme confusion from Darwin. Firstly with the perpetuation of the racist idea that there are several human species and subspecies ("Descent of Man"). Finally, the Darwinian model prevented to understand that archaic humans were a single species who interbred of whom we are the descendants. As the scientific theory the Darwin theory is false now, but Nietzsche was claiming that it was naive and false in the XIX° century.
Didier Raoult wrote several works directly related to reflection on evolution, one in French named "Beyond Darwin" and the other in English on Kindle named "Of Ignorance and blindness”.