Richard Watson

Richard Watson

Department of Electronics and Computer Science/Institute for Life Sciences; University of Southampton, U.K

Watson’s research combines expertise in computer science (AI, learning algorithms, optimisation)  with evolutionary biology, cognitive science and complexity science. His main scientific ambition is to figure out how biological evolution really works – i.e. the algorithm of (biological) creation. His working hypothesis is that natural cognition preceded natural selection, and that genetic evolution is not the source of adaptations but serves as a long-term memory mechanism for adaptations that have already been learned by the living organism. His main socio-cultural ambition is to undo some of the harm that is done to society and our sense of personal purpose and meaning by the “survival of the fittest” myth.

Profile continued

Richard Watson received a B.A. in Artificial Intelligence in 1990, MSc in Evolutionary and Adaptive Systems 1996, and PhD. Computer Science 2002, before becoming a postdoctoral research fellow in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard. Since 2004 he has been at the University of Southampton where he teaches Artificial Intelligence and Evolution. He now has ~80 publications (h-index 38) in evolutionary theory, complex systems and computational optimisation including topics in coevolutionary algorithms, fitness landscapes, artificial life models, dynamical systems, model-building optimisation, modularity, multi-objective optimisation, optimisation, machine learning, and collective robotics – as well as population genetics, the benefit of sexual recombination, evolution of evolvability, evolutionary transitions in individuality, adaptive plasticity, cellular differentiation, social evolution, biological agency, exploratory mechanisms and developmental bias. Esteem factors include: IEEE international award “Ten to Watch in AI”, celebrating 50 years of AI (2006), Best paper in the field of Artificial Life 2016 (International ISAL award), Featured in cover articles of New Scientist magazine 2016 and 2020.

Watson’s research detailed the close relationship between evolution and learning and, in particular, how the action of natural selection on the connections of a gene-regulation network follows the same principles as learning mechanisms on the connections of a neural network. This means that evolution (when acting on the interactions of a dynamical system) has the same memory, learning and generalisation capabilities as learning neural networks. Recently, with Chris Buckley at Sussex, he showed that the same cognitive capabilities of memory, learning and adaptive behaviour occur spontaneously in physical systems under simple conditions (e.g. a network of masses connected by springs, analogous to many natural dynamical systems). He calls this “Natural Induction” to contrast with natural selection and emphasise the learning principles involved.  The next step in this line of work is to recognise that if natural systems can learn and adapt without natural selection, and natural selection canalises solutions that have already been learned, then natural selection becomes a follower not a leader in evolutionary change – hence, “cognition-first evolution”. From this point of view, “survival of the fittest” and “what persists exists” fail to capture the prime mover in living systems. These are replaced by ideas like “the differential easing of frustrations between things”, “deeply vulnerable mutual knowing” and “what relates creates”. Most recently, he has been working on a theory of life based on complex harmonic resonance or ‘songs of life and mind’. This aims to develop a calculus relating development (the organisational transformation of material structures), evolution (adaptation and the accumulation of information) and cognition (memory, learning and agential behaviour) into one unified theory. 

Quote

 

"To imagine that evolution by natural selection explains biological evolution is as wrong-headed as believing that a theory of electricity explains how cognition works. Sure, electricity is involved in the processes of cognition (in brains and computers), and if you measure it then it will agree with your theories relating potential difference to the flow of charge, and its even true that if you turn the electricity off, the cognition will stop. But a theory of potential differences and current flow is not a theory of cognition at all. Neither is a theory of selection coefficients and frequency change a theory of biological evolution."

Books

Publications

Websites